Link to Content Area
:::

Institute of Transportation, MOTC

:::
  • small size
  • medium size
  • large size
  • print
  • facebook
  • plurk
  • twitter

Transportation Dissertation

Title Comparative Studies of Mountainside road rehabilitation using reinforced earth or conventional construction method
Year 2007
Summary

Shao-chao Chen,2007.07
Feng Chia University

  The conventional construction method to mountainside road projects impact on the environment is great, and construction materials from the acquisition, construction of the construction, operation, maintenance of the recovery of using the life cycle, and each link all of the Earth's environment impact. Reinforced earth construction method stressed to the security of infrastructure under the prerequisite of creating a quality environment, leveraging the power of local conditions, according to the type of construction and the environmental characteristics adopt the most appropriate level of response governance mechanisms. The study, with the "level of analysis (AHP)" to undertake expert survey, and statistical analysis to calculate the levels of decision-making and assessment guidelines weights as mountainside road construction reinforced earth construction method and the conventional construction method based on the integrated assessment that the road safety under the prerequisite that on the ecological level, the environmental aspects, economic aspects and dimensions such as construction of four levels for the appraisal and analysis. In an actual mountain road rehabilitation projects, for instance, compared with the traditional method stiffening at all levels considerations selected findings, in order to test the Institute to establish a comprehensive assessment of the correctness of policy makers to determine strategies for references.
Count Views:279
Top